Directory · R
New here? Start with the premise →
Reverence
2 min read · 526 words
Reverence is the operator’s response to recognition of something larger than themselves — and the response is part of what the system was built for.
The hardware contains the receptors. Encountering the natural environment at scale, certain forms of art and music, the long traditions of practice, the apparent vastness of time and space, the acts of unusual courage or generosity in other operators — these can produce a specific category of response: the felt smallness of the operator, the felt magnitude of what is being encountered, the natural impulse to stillness or attention or some form of acknowledgment. The response is not religious in any specific sense. It is structural to the system.
The cultural environment has reduced occasions for reverence. The natural environment is increasingly mediated by screens. The arts are often consumed in fragmentary, distracted forms that prevent the full encounter. The long traditions are dismissed as outdated. The operator’s continuous input from social and informational streams keeps attention on the human-scale and the immediate, where reverence has nothing to attach to. Many operators run for long periods without ever encountering anything that produces the response. The system that has the receptors is not receiving the inputs that activate them.
The cost of this is hard to quantify but real. The operator running without reverence loses contact with the felt sense of context — the awareness of being a small system within much larger systems, of being part of long traditions, of operating in conditions that exceed individual scale. The loss often shows up indirectly: increased self-importance, reduced humility, the chronic low-grade dysregulation that comes from a system having lost contact with what makes its own concerns proportionate. The operator who never feels small in relation to anything ends up larger in their own self-model than is accurate, which produces the dysfunctions of inflation.
From the chair: arrange occasions for reverence. The deliberate exposure to environments that produce it — natural settings at scale, certain works of art, performances done at high level, traditions practiced with seriousness, the company of operators who themselves operate with reverence in their domain. None of these requires belief in any specific framework. They require the inputs that the receptors will respond to.
The other discipline: when reverence arises, do not move past it quickly. The system’s response will fade with attention to other input. The few moments when the operator has access to the felt sense of the larger context are valuable; receiving them takes deliberate stilling. The operator who notices the response and immediately checks the phone has lost the access. The operator who notices and remains, briefly, in the response receives what the response was offering.
The other application: reverence in interactions. Some operators, some traditions, some kinds of work warrant the operator’s full attention and care, not as performance but because what is present actually warrants it. The operator who can recognize when reverence is the appropriate response, and run it, has access to depth in those interactions that the operator who treats everything at the same flat level of engagement does not.