Overcommitment

Overcommitment is the condition in which the organism has agreed to more operations than the system has resources to sustain.

The mechanism: each individual commitment, assessed at the moment of agreement, seemed manageable. The system didn’t run the cumulative calculation — the total load of all commitments assessed simultaneously. The organism said yes, yes, yes — each one reasonable in isolation — and the sum exceeds the system’s capacity.

---

The No entry covered the mechanism that prevents overcommitment at the point of agreement. Overcommitment is the condition that exists after the failure to deploy it: the operator’s capacity is fully allocated, the demands exceed the supply, and the system begins running in deficit — borrowing from sleep, maintenance, and recovery to meet the obligations that were accepted without accounting for the cumulative cost.

The Margin entry’s absence. The Burnout entry’s trajectory. The organism running in overcommitment is on the path from one to the other.

From the chair: when the system is running in overcommitment, the available responses are renegotiate (change the terms of existing commitments), delegate (transfer operations to other systems), eliminate (withdraw from commitments that aren’t essential), or continue (and pay the accumulating cost). The first three cost social friction. The fourth costs the operator’s health and function.

Choose the friction. The hardware is more expensive to repair than the relationships are to renegotiate.